Station Approach, Winchester
CLIENT ADVISER
Sarah Williams
2015– ongoing
CLIENT
Winchester City Council
URBAN DESIGNERS
Publica
LEAD ARCHITECT
Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands
SERVICES PROVIDED
– Input into strategic briefing and procurement documents
– Design Competition panel member
– Detailed brief development
– Advice on the selection of designers and team members
– Design review and evaluation
– Regular reporting to offices and cabinet members
– Advice and council at all early project stages Viability input and business case planning
Challenges
Why was a Client Adviser required?
The project is a masterplan framework for the central area of Winchester and the development of a large site adjacent to the station. A Client Adviser was initially required to support an RIBA competition for this large mixed-use commercial project comprising offices, food and beverage, retail, public realm, car parking and ancillary accommodation. Prior to this, the original designs that had been developed following a competitive procedure had not been acceptable to the community and the procurement process had therefore been halted, requiring a new approach.
Ongoing services were required to provide impartial advice throughout the early design stages and to ensure accountability and transparency for the cabinet and council members . Also, the enhancement of client capacity and expertise was required for this historically difficult project, due,in part, to major stakeholder interest.
Outcomes
What value was created
A transparent and well organised two-stage competition process began the process of a wider consultation and inclusion in the procurement process for selecting the team. A wide variety of stakeholders formed part of the panel that inputed into the selection process. This resulted in the unanimous selection of a winning practice which was extremely helpful in establishing the ground work for the project, with everyone on side.
A detailed and robust brief was developed with a move away from the orginal extensive parking requirements to a more modest provision and therefore reducing the need for a denser built scheme, which had previously failed. The parking had been cited at the lower levels in a basement, due to the need to have active frontages at ground level. This increased the cost and therefore the requirement to provide more accommodation to make the scheme viable. Reduced parking meant reduced cost, a reduction in building density and a more sustainable development.
A successful consultation process was undertaken with a wide community of stakeholders. This was a key requirement of any new scheme to ensure a positive response to the project and to incorporate as many constructive comments as possible. A number of positive design reviews with external design panels were undertaken, resulting in only modest changes.
Effective communications between the architects and client team created a positive project environment where good progress was made. Regular reports to the members and cabinet enabled project progression to next stages and bolstered accountability and verification. Impartial day-to-day advice for the officers on all design matters promoted timely and sound decision-making.